Comments on: Goal.com: Galaxy Accepts Offer for Becks

By: Fredo

Fredo — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:47:02 +0000

“Biggest loser in this deal? adidas.

?Isn’t AC Milan sponsored by adidas?”

Adidas is making out no matter what. I find it interesting that since his days at ManU he has only played for Adidas sponsored clubs; Real Madrid, Galaxy, and now A.C. Milan. I wonder how much of an influence Adidas has on where he can/can’t play. (Homeboy can certainly sell a jersey and some predators) He spent a winter training with Arsenal (Nike sponsored club) but there was never a big deal made about it.

anyways, just a thought.

By: Huts

Huts — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:49:02 +0000

Good Riddance

By: zidanescores

zidanescores — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:21:43 +0000

“Biggest loser in this deal? adidas.”

?Isn’t AC Milan sponsored by adidas?

By: tim in houston

tim in houston — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:24:30 +0000

Donovan will hopefully stay at Bayern, its best for his career although I think he will be back to the Galaxy. Theyre hopeless without either of them…well even moreso without them.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:09:28 +0000

Move on…let the Galaxy rebuild with MLS players & become competitive. The Becks deal has actually killed the product (Gals) on the field.

re: Donovan, same thing, move on…let him go & wish him well!

By: markovitch

markovitch — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:50:36 +0000

Biggest loser in this deal? adidas.

By: rhybread

rhybread — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:24:54 +0000

Hopefully they drop ticket prices next year…

By: noname

noname — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:22:24 +0000

I just want this to end. Gone, staying, gone, staying…..gone?