Comments on: Chelsea Close to Signing Sergio Agüero to £100m+ Deal

By: BISMARK

BISMARK — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:29:00 +0000

I think this money should be used to buy torres as joe said.cos he is not feeling good at liverpool.

By: lionel cicero

lionel cicero — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:50:12 +0000

good signing but am worried where he’ll play ‘cos Anelka and Drogba are two really good players that complement themselves very well except anelka would be sold

By: Robert

Robert — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:25:53 +0000

maybe they will play 3 up top like Barcelona…?

By: Germandarius

Germandarius — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:20:44 +0000

Can you say “over-rated”?

By: meji

meji — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:19:34 +0000

they are going to have a 100m pound player sitting on their bench. absolutely ridiculous.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:33:44 +0000

Does any Chelsea supporter think that 50 million pounds should be spent on this guy? I know he is very good but what is going to happen when Drogba gets back. He isnt going to replace him or Anelka. Can Aguero play on the wing? I know they wont be able to sign players after this winter but all this money on 1 guy seems a little crazy.

By: rmword

rmword — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:19:58 +0000

Joe are you really Joe Cole. Because its ok, you will find some playing time of the bench…maybe

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:32:18 +0000

Why spend all that money on Aguero when they could probably get David Villa and David Silva both from Valencia if they threw that amount of cash at the club. The EPL isnt La Liga and he is a little guy that can get taken out of his game with physical play. I bet if they threw that money at Liverpool, Torres could become available. They could get 2 really good players with that kind of money.